Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(2): 211-215, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37981059

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a single dose of oral cefixime 800 mg plus oral doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 7 days, compared with a recommended single dose of ceftriaxone plus single dose of oral azithromycin, for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital, rectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhoea. METHODS: A noninferiority, open-label, multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted in Prague, Czech Republic. Some 161 patients, 18-65 years of age diagnosed with uncomplicated urogenital, rectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhoea by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) were randomized to treatment with single dose of cefixime 800 mg plus doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 1 week or a single dose of ceftriaxone 1 g intramuscularly plus single dose of azithromycin 2 g. The primary outcome was the number of participants with negative culture and NAAT at 1 week and 3 weeks, respectively, after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In all, 161 patients were randomized and 152 were included in per-protocol analyses. All 76 (100%; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00) patients treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin achieved negative cultures and NAAT after treatment. In the cefixime plus doxycycline arm at week 1, culture was negative in all 76 (100%) patients; at week 3, culture was negative in 70 of the 76 patients (92%; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97) and NAAT negative in 66 of the 76 patients (87%; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94). At week 3, culture and NAAT were negative in 65 of the 76 patients (86%; 95% CI, 0.76-0.93). Per-protocol risk difference was 14.5%; 95% CI, 6.56-22.38. All treatment failures observed in the cefixime arm were pharyngeal gonorrhoea cases. DISCUSSION: The combination of cefixime and doxycycline did not achieve noninferiority to ceftriaxone and azithromycin for treatment of gonorrhoea when including pharyngeal gonorrhoea. It did, however, show high efficacy for urogenital and rectal gonorrhoea.


Subject(s)
Ceftriaxone , Gonorrhea , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cefixime/therapeutic use , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Gonorrhea/drug therapy , Gonorrhea/microbiology , Neisseria gonorrhoeae
2.
Euro Surveill ; 28(32)2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561052

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted some potential limitations of transmission-based precautions. The distinction between transmission through large droplets vs aerosols, which have been fundamental concepts guiding infection control measures, has been questioned, leading to considerable variation in expert recommendations on transmission-based precautions for COVID-19. Furthermore, the application of elements of contact precautions, such as the use of gloves and gowns, is based on low-quality and inconclusive evidence and may have unintended consequences, such as increased incidence of healthcare-associated infections and spread of multidrug-resistant organisms. These observations indicate a need for high-quality studies to address the knowledge gaps and a need to revisit the theoretical background regarding various modes of transmission and the definitions of terms related to transmission. Further, we should examine the implications these definitions have on the following components of transmission-based precautions: (i) respiratory protection, (ii) use of gloves and gowns for the prevention of respiratory virus infections, (iii) aerosol-generating procedures and (iv) universal masking in healthcare settings as a control measure especially during seasonal epidemics. Such a review would ensure that transmission-based precautions are consistent and rationally based on available evidence, which would facilitate decision-making, guidance development and training, as well as their application in practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infection Control , Personal Protective Equipment , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets
3.
J Pers Med ; 12(12)2022 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556249

ABSTRACT

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a life-saving treatment for respiratory failure that may serve as a bridge to patient recovery or lung transplantation. In COVID-19, recovery is somewhat unpredictable and occasionally occurs after >100 days on VV-ECMO support. Thus, determining therapy cessation may be difficult. We report the case of a 59-year-old male without specific risk factors admitted to a tertiary center for rapidly progressive respiratory failure due to severe COVID-19, despite aggressive mechanical ventilatory support. Immediate insertion of VV-ECMO was associated with prompt resolution of hypoxemia and hypercapnia; however, all therapeutic efforts to wean the patient from VV-ECMO failed. During the prolonged hospitalization on VV-ECMO, sepsis was the most life-threatening complication. The patient overcame roughly 40 superinfections, predominantly affecting the respiratory tract, and spent 183 days on antimicrobial treatment. Although the function of other organ systems was generally stable, gradually progressive right ventricular dysfunction due to precapillary pulmonary hypertension required increasing doses of inotropes. A successful lung transplantation was performed after 207 days of VV-ECMO support. The present case provides evidence for prolonged VV-ECMO therapy as a bridge to lung transplantation in severe COVID-19 despite numerous, predominantly infectious complications.

4.
PLoS One ; 11(6): e0157981, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27322433

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study presents the results of a multidisciplinary, nosocomial MRSA outbreak investigation in an 8-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU). The identification of seven MRSA positive patients in the beginning of 2014 led to the closure of the ward for several weeks. A multidisciplinary, retrospective investigation was initiated in order to identify the reason and the source for the outbreak, describe MRSA transmission in the department and identify limitations in infection control. METHODS: The investigation comprised an epidemiological description of MRSA cases from 2012 to 2014 and a characterization of MRSA isolates, including phage-, spa- and PFGE-typing. Additionally, MRSA screening was performed from the hospital staff and the environment. To identify the reason for the outbreak, work-related, psychological and behavioral factors were investigated by impartial audits and staff interviews. RESULTS: Thirty-one MRSA cases were registered during the study period, and 36 isolates were investigated. Molecular typing determined the outbreak strain (phage type 54/812, PFGE type A4, spa type t003) and identified the probable index case. Nasal carriage in one employee and a high environmental contamination with the outbreak strain was documented. Important gaps in nursing procedures and general management were identified. Elevated stress levels and communication problems preceded the outbreak. Compliance with hand hygiene and isolation procedures was evaluated as appropriate. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the complexity of controlling hospital-associated infections. The combined use of different typing methods is beneficial for outbreak investigations. Psychological, behavioral and other work-related factors have an important impact on the spread of nosocomial pathogens. These factors should be addressed and integrated in routine infection control practice.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Infection Control/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Behavior , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Work/psychology
6.
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek ; 15(5): 166-70, 2009 Oct.
Article in Czech | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19916155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Significant bacteriuria is very important marker of urinary tract infection. The standard method for diagnosis of UTI is quantitative urine culture and identification of bacteria. For rapid enumeration of bacteria in urine semiautomatic systems were developed. Aim of the study was to compare the results of the conventional urine culture method with nephelometric enumeration of bacterial cells in urine. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Urine samples were evaluated simultaneously by Uro-Quick and quantitative urine culture. RESULTS: In summary 1 653 urine samples were elaborated, 402 (83.05 %) from 484 positive samples had positive results in Uro-Quick. Sensitivity of Uro-Quick was 0.83, specificity 0.95, positive predictive value 0.85, negative predictive value 0.93 and accuracy 90.68. Culture time extension improved statistical performance characteristic of Uro-Quick. Problem of the method is the detection of the low amounts of microorganisms. Uro-Quick did not detected microbial growth in 16.77 % of samples containing >/= ten to the fourth CFU/ml of microorganisms. The advantage of Uro-Quick is the speed, 73.93 % of the samples with high microbial concentrations (>/= ten to the fifth CFU/ml) were detected in three hours. CONCLUSION: Uro-Quick offers rapid detection of urine samples with high microbial concentrations, but did not replace the quantitative culture of. Nephelometric detection is necessary to complete with agar plate cultivation.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Indicator Dilution Techniques , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Bacteriuria/microbiology , Humans , Nephelometry and Turbidimetry , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...